Created on Wednesday, 13 Feb 2019. Posted in Literature
Created on Tuesday, 15 Jan 2019. Posted in Literature
Created on Wednesday, 12 Dec 2018. Posted in Literature
Created on Wednesday, 14 Nov 2018. Posted in Literature
Other items of interest
Created on Thursday, 18 Oct 2018. Posted in Literature
Created on Wednesday, 18 Jul 2018. Posted in Literature
Closing the gap between research production and research use is a key challenge for the health research system. Stakeholder engagement is being increasingly promoted across the board by health research funding organisations, and indeed by many researchers themselves, as an important pathway to achieving impact. This opinion piece draws on a study of stakeholder engagement in research and a systematic literature search conducted as part of the study.
Created on Monday, 12 Jun 2017. Posted in Literature
Librarians and information specialists' involvement during the development of grant applications for external funding can save researchers' time, provide specialist support and contribute to reducing avoidable waste in research. This article presents a survey of information specialists working for the National Institute for Health Research Research Design Service within English applied health services research, and a scoping review to identify other examples of librarians supporting grant applications. The survey found that support included: checking the proposed research has not already been done; literature searching to provide background for the project; advising on or writing systematic review methods. The scoping review found three examples where librarians were involved: in writing sections of the application; conducting reviews and becoming a co-applicant. We recommend librarians engage with researchers by checking whether search requests are to support an application and by becoming familiar with resources and techniques to support grant proposal development.
Created on Thursday, 02 Mar 2017. Posted in Literature
Removing the ‘gag’: involving people with dementia in research as advisers and participants Jenni Brooks, Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics, Sheffield Hallam University; Nada Savitch, Innovations in Dementia; Kate Gridley, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York
People with dementia are often excluded from taking part in research because of perceived difficulties in consent, capacity and communication. We argue that involving people with dementia in research is important, and describe how we involved people with dementia as both advisers and participants in research about the use of life story work.
Researchers worked in partnership with Innovations in Dementia, who supported a network of advisers with dementia. Focus groups were arranged to ensure meaningful contributions by people with dementia. It was difficult to use standardised quality-of-life measures, and we describe the challenges faced with capacity and consent, recruitment and selection, and data collection. We suggest there is a need for (a) new tools for measuring quality of life of people with dementia which do not require participants to respond in prescribed ways, and (b) ethics and consent processes which are appropriate for non-medical research and which facilitate the involvement of people with dementia.
Read the full paper on: http://the-sra.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/social-research-practice-journal-issue-03-winter-2017.pdf (see page 3 - 14)
Created on Monday, 30 Jan 2017. Posted in Literature
The latest NIHR podcast is entitled ‘The culture of research’ and is a 10-12 minute podcast interview with Catherine Joynson, Assistant Director at the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Catherine talks about the culture of scientific research, leading on from the Nuffield report published in 2015.
Across the series of 7 podcasts, listeners will hear the thoughts and opinions of a whole range of different people involved in clinical research. The podcast series also includes a virtual journal club, which involves the discussion of a recent, open-access paper to be discussed.
The Systematic Review Toolbox is a searchable catalogue of tools that can be used to help you do a systematic review. Users can perform a simple keyword search (i.e. Quick Search) to locate tools, a more detailed search (i.e. Advanced Search) allowing users to select various criteria to find specific types of tools and submit new tools to the database.
The Toolbox also contains checklists, guidelines and reporting standards for systematic reviews.